\n"; echo $styleSheet; ?>
Home > Moore's Lore


Moore's Lore

January 11, 2005
The Giant Stirs In Digital MusicEmail This EntryPrint This Entry
Posted by Dana

Microsoft has finally stirred to life in the digital music arena.

Microsoft is usually a day late and a dollar short when it comes to innovation. But it brings so many OEMs and software developers to the party that it usually overwhelms its opponent. Microsoft was a half-decade or more behind Apple in GUI development during the 1980s, but today it has over 90% of the market, and Apple has about 3%.

We can argue the why of that later. Frankly, given the size of Microsoft Research I find it remarkable that the company finds itself in the same situation it did when Gates and Jobs (and I) were all so green together. The point is that Gates once again has Jobs in his sights, and the question is whether he will succeed in toppling the iPod.

Will he?

Why He Might -- Steve Jobs keeps making the same mistakes, maintaining proprietary technology, especially in the hardware field, in a proprietary way. Microsoft still has 90% of the desktops, it can overwhelm anyone with the sheer size of its marketing, and its stuff should come to market costing less than comparable Apple gear.

Why He Might Not -- Apple is no longer a manufacturer. It's an OEM. It can supply the demand for iPods in ways it couldn't back in the 1980s, when it was the sole source for early Macs. And Jobs has learned in 20 years, as have we all. Too late now may be just too late.

My Take -- At the suggestion of a friendly merchant I downloaded iTunes software for the PC. It's much better than the Windows equivalent. My PC spent several days transferring my music files to the Apple format. I also noted that, after installing iTunes, a new version of Windows Media Player refused to install until it was named my "default" player, and presumably given permission to change my music back to its format.

This is where the rubber really meets the road, not in the players but in the formats. The real news here may be how Real gets squeezed out. (I no longer play multimedia files on the BBC site because Real keeps demanding money for upgrades that seem like nothing and it's going to play the same "default" game as the other two, which I don't have time for.)

So, .AAC, .WMA, or .RAM? Right now it's in that order.


Category: Business Strategy


COMMENTS
Eric of Digital M4 on January 11, 2005 03:01 PM writes...

".AAC, .WMA, or .RAM?"

What's in a name, a rose by any other name would smell as sweet!

I have thought that the protocols are the key, but since everybody's PC software offers a no-brainer conversion of the competing format to their own, all that remains for positioning is the restriction of protocols on each portable player.

Of course one can just convert the files on one's PC and load them to their iPod, Rio, etc.

I'm not sure if there is any quality loss with each conversion, but I do not gather the digital music movement is about hi-fidelity.

Meanwhile, who is going to spend $10,000 plus to fill their digital library with a full hard drive of songs? The empty disk space, the software functionality, and the high song price point for an (e.g.) iTunes download, make "free" (legally free or not) songs of interest, and a lot of that is going to remain MP3.

There are good, legal-free MP3 tracks on http://songzilla.blogspot.com and elsewhere.

/Eric

Permalink to Comment


TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL: http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8143




POST A COMMENT
Name:

Email:

URL:

Comments:

Remember personal info?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES