Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Moore's Lore

« More Proof CAN-SPAM Can't | Main | Celebrate A Republican »

May 27, 2004

The Myth of Once And For All

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

I've learned from cartoons of two big lies we tell our children. (That's Yugioh, a Japanese cartoon character my kids like, from RedJupiter.com.)

We tell them that evil people know they're evil, that they stand for evil, and that they have evil intent. We give them lines like "Bwa-ha-ha-ha!"

Second, we tell them that the battle of good and evil can be solved, that the story can be ended, that we can be happy ever after. We're going to end this, the hero will say, "once and for all."

Adults know better, or we're supposed to. We learn that no leader really has evil intentions. Hitler and Stalin were nationalists. Osama Bin Laden considers himself a defender of the faith.

What makes you good or evil, in the end, isn't ends but means. Those who do evil are "evil-doers."

Now all nations have evil-doers among them. We call them our military. These people are allowed to use euphemisms for the evil they do, like "collateral damage." We let them do this for two reasons. First, if we forced them to face what they were doing squarely most couldn't do it. Second, we depend on their leaders to tell greater good from lesser evil. We call this the burden of command.

Our great commanders have always been haunted by what they forced men to do in the name of their causes. As it was for Washington so it was for Lincoln and Lee, for Wilson and Eisenhower. There is anguish and guilt. Eisenhower talked of having to act cheerful among men he was sending to death. It wears on you, he wrote.

In order to win our wars, we also use propaganda to muddy these distinctions. We pin inhuman labels on our opponents. We forgive everything our own side does. We must do this. Otherwise how could we do such evil, or allow it to be done in our name?

But in our hearts we know different. The Greatest Generation knew what evil they did in World War II. My dad never talked about it. Chances are yours didn't either. They just tried, through the rest of their lives, to do good, to leave something positive. They prayed you would never face what they did and could make a positive choice. Vietnam veterans are the same way, even though their war was lost. Many have traveled back to Vietnam. Others have plunged into public service.

But Vietnam didn't touch everyone, then or now. Millions of men and women were able to avoid service. Some did this deliberately, others did it by accident. (In my case, I was just a year too young. I filed for the draft in 1973 and no one was taken.) As a result we gained the benefits of the propaganda without having to face the contradictions that made it necessary.

This has happened before. Men too young to have fought in the Civil War created the game of football and committed genocide against America's Indians. Later they sought the glory of the Spanish-American conflict, or like Stephen Crane they re-created the conflicts in fiction.

What makes America unique among nations is that I can write this, you can read this, and if you're an American we can do something about it. We are not slaves to leaders who confuse means and ends, who believe their own propaganda, or who have no qualms about the evil done in their name.

We can end it, once and for all. Or we can endorse it. But if we endorse it, as a people, none of us - even those who opposed the war - will ever wash our hands of what was done in our name.

It's unfair that, to be good, you have to fight with one hand tied behind the back. You have to obey moral strictures your evil opponent thinks nothing of breaking. It's not a fair fight. It's asymmetrical.

For those who seek to do good the choices will inevitably be harder than for those who confuse ends and means. As the conflict grows fiercer, as it nears its climax, these decisions get harder. If you're not anguished by them you're not thinking, you're not truly an adult, and you're likely to be manipulated, as a child is, by the simplest tales of good vs. evil, able to rationalize anything done in your name to reach once and for all.

My prayer for America is adulthood.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Politics


COMMENTS

1. roux on May 27, 2004 04:03 PM writes...

So I guess if I push an old lady into the path of oncoming traffic or push her out of the oncoming traffic it's the same. It's all relative.

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/6229


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack