Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Moore's Lore

« Your Move, Yahoo | Main | IP Or Circuit Voice? »

July 14, 2004

Sitefinder: Don't Do THAT Again

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

ICANN has finished its technical review of Verisign's controversial SiteFinder service. (ICANN logo from InetConcepts.)

Bottom line: Big Mistake.

SiteFinder was designed to take misspelled domain requests to a Verisign page, backed by advertising, where users would be given choices for where the might want to go. As The Register properly headlined it, "All Your Web Typos Belong To Us."

What could be wrong with that, given that Verisign is registrar for the .com and .net domains in question? Plenty, the ICANN Committee found:

  • The change to SiteFinder was made suddenly and without notice.
  • The change impacted all Internet services, or "layers," not just http requests. For instance, e-mail sent to wrong addresses was misdirected, causing huge headaches, especially since spam is often deliberately misaddressed.
  • All the patches and workarounds to the problems caused by SiteFinder caused their own problems. When the fixes were good, they were put in without notice, as Sitefinder itself was, causing collateral damage. And when they were bad they were awful.
  • Verisign was collecting personal information from users without their knowledge or consent, because Verisign logged all activity on the SiteFinder site.
  • All this undermined public confidence in the Internet governance system.

Verisign critics made all these points when SiteFinder was created, and have made them since. In essence ICANN found Verisign guilty of all charges. (Verisign logo from CNN.)

And the penalty for creating all this havoc?

Nothing. No penalty to Verisign is specified, or even hinted again. Just don't do this again without telling us, Verisign is told. Or what? Or nothing.

And that is the problem. In fact ICANN doesn't really run anything. ICANN has a contract with Verisign, which runs everything important. ICANN can't cancel that contract without doing massive damage to the system. Any threat to do so is empty.

So who runs the Internet? Verisign does. And Verisign has proven itself unworthy of that charge, according to this report.

What happens now?

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Internet


TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/6363


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack