Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Moore's Lore

« "Gaming" AdSense | Main | Riding With Lance VI - Sestriere and Beyond »

July 23, 2004

Overturn Betamax?

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

The head of the U.S. Copyright Office, Marybeth Peters (left, from the Library of Congress site), has come out squarely for overturning the Betamax decision, which made your VCR legal.

Corante's Ernest Miller is all over this. But let me add my two cents.

This is an election year. The money and support of the copyright industries could make the difference. The Bush Administration is willing to bend over and grease up in order to gain that support.

And if they win with it, it's the rest of us who are screwed. Or, as Vice President Cheney put it to Senator Pat Leahy, "go f___ yourself."

You will be able to trace the results of Peters' advocacy, but only some of it, at Fundrace.org. Let me add two caveats:


  • The copyright industries have given to both sides, and have many friends on the Democratic side of the aisle, including the aforementioned Leahy.
  • The most important support the copyright industries might give the Administration -- endorsements and slanting of news to suit it -- won't show up on any cash-tracking site.

We should all be very afraid when the government decides to make all of us criminals. And if you even have a VCR, that's what Marybeth Peters wants to do to you.

It gets worse than that. Every Web site that caches, every Web client that has cache, could be in violation of this act, and would be in violation if Peters got her way. It's appalling.

What's vital is that the opponents of this INDUCE Act carefully trace who supports it, who opposes it, and get endorsements out widely for opponents of Copyright Totalitarianism by Election Day.

Otherwise the whole country could become a gulag. And don't buy any crap about "we're not going to take your VCR" or "we're just going to target the real criminals." The boundary of the law should be what's written, not some other point where police deem to make the enforcement stand.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Copyright


TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/6392


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack