« An Antenna For Light |
Main
| Fry Job »
September 20, 2004
SIPShare Shows Why Peer-to-Peer Can't Be Stopped
Posted by Dana Blankenhorn
In the end peer-to-peer has nothing to do with copyright. It's the way the Earth links.
For linking people and ideas, P2P is simply a better topology than client-server. It conforms to the way people are. Capitalism is a peer-to-peer economic system. Socialism is client-server. Democracy is a peer-to-peer political system. Autocracy is client-server.
The difference is just that stark.
The myth of the "Intellectual Property cult" is that the products of intellect are unique, complete, all-in-all. They are not. "If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants." That's Sir Isaac Newton.
This applies to all products of the intellect:
- The movie "Sky Captain" builds, not just on software, but on movies like Fritz Lang's Metropolis and the great science-fiction stories of the 1930s.
- M.C. Hammer's biggest hit, "Can't Touch This," was based on a sample from the late Rick James' hit "Superfreak."
- Frank Baum's "The Wizard of Oz" stories were a reaction to stories like Lewis Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland." The later work could not have happened without the former.
Until the idiocy of "business method patents" the U.S. Patent Office always assumed that new inventions could be built on old ones. To deny the right of people to sample other works, as a court recently held, is
absurd on its face.
All this is a long-winded introduction to a new product of Earthlink research.
Earthlink calls it SIPshare . SIPshare demonstrates that the heart of Voice Over IP is that it's a peer-to-peer system. SIPshare uses the Session Initiated Protocol on which VOIP is built to create a true file-sharing system.
In the end it's no great leap. Earthlink is re-creating the business "grapevine," that invisible network that lets rumors become transmitted as facts before they're even announced. It's a natural, normal human process.
Try to ban the grapevine and you make humanity itself a copyright violation.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Consulting | Copyright | Economics | History | Internet
- RELATED ENTRIES
- › The Legend of Dennis Hayes
- › Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
- › Welcome to 1966
- › What Must Craigslist Do?
- › No Such Thing as Free WiFi
- › The Internet As A Political Issue
- › Google Images Ruled Illegal
- › Fall of Radio Shack
Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
1. fateri eminaj on September 21, 2004 07:01 AM writes...
What's topology explain it plaese?
Permalink to Comment2. Brad Hutchings on September 21, 2004 07:01 PM writes...
Toplogy -- network layout.
The biggest roadblocks to P2P are routers and firewalls, which are increasingly used to protect end-users' computers from the worst threats of the Internet and to allow multiple users to share a single Internet address. They are the biggest support and deployment headache for any P2P system. The advantage that client/server has in this area is that anyone can connect to the server and the server can act as a multiplexer among clients that would not be able to connect to one another. The main penalties for client server are bandwidth and latency.
With SIP phones popularity on the rise, there is a HUGE business opportunity in helping people set up their home LANs for P2P applications. Huge I tell ya,
Permalink to Comment