Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Moore's Lore

« Verizon Halts Internet Service | Main | The Always On Era Is Here »

January 17, 2005

Why Would Google Want Dark Fiber?

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

Mirroring.

It's that simple.

Google has a huge amount of data, spread over many international locations. And there are many people in, say, France, who might want to query data held elsewhere, say, in the U.S.

As Google's translation services grow, this becomes more likely.

Google's telecommunications bills must already be extraordinary, in order to handle this traffic.

If Google had its own dark fiber network, it could light that fiber and drive those costs to the ground.

Then the fiber would be open to other applications, such as:

  • Mirroring the entire database in multiple sites.
  • Caching the database, or portions of it, where laws are most advantageous for that.
  • Caching such things as images.
  • Offering a video database.
  • Creating "Google libraries" of others' data and mirroring it to the central database.
The opportunities are just endless.

But if Google is stuck buying capacity from Bell companies and other local monopolies, it can easily be strangled.

No smart business wants to be strangled.

Google is just being Clued-in.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Internet


COMMENTS

1. Dimitar Vesselinov on January 18, 2005 09:37 AM writes...

Google should and will diversify its revenue model. They remember the Netscape's doom and they won't repeat the same mistake. The advertising model won't be enough in the future. Why? The click fraud and the new aggressive players in the search field are the main threats. Google Mini is part of the transformational process. What's next? Can we say Google Broadband?

http://divedi.blogspot.com/2004/10/google-broadband.html
http://divedi.blogspot.com/2005/01/google-broadband-2.html

Newsweek On Click Fraud, Search Engine Response
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/18/026224

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/6954


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack