Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Boston area?: Join us on June 11 for Startups and the Cloud, a free event on cloud computing with insights from Intuit founder Scott Cook and others

Moore's Lore

« UWB Standard Struggles Hit the FCC | Main | Two Ways To WiFi Coverage »

March 09, 2005

Democratic Choice on Software Patents

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

Neither U.S. voters nor their elected representatives have ever endorsed the idea of patenting software, or mathematical algorithms. It was done by a court.

If this stupidity is to rule over Europe, it's fitting that the people's representatives should decide the question, and it now appears that they will.

The European Commission has pitched the question of software patents to the European Parliament, and will abide by a negative vote.

The winning argument is that software patents would bring Europe a permanent negative balance of payments, and place a toll on European innovation.

That's because most software patents are held by Americans or Asians, not Europeans. When patents are used inside other inventions, and most future inventions will involve software as a component, they represent a tax on innovation.

Software already has ample protection via copyright. The purpose of a patent is not to protect the expression, but the ideas behind it, to forestall improvements in the invention by someone else.

Some European companies would benefit from software patents. But most would pay, and so would Europe's people.

If you live in the EC, contact your member of Parliament today and urge them to vote "non."

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Copyright


TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/7117


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack