« Is A Drug Danger Story Being Ignored? |
Main
| American Diaspora 18 »
May 11, 2005
CNN Surrenders to Blogosphere
Posted by Dana Blankenhorn
With CNN's decision, now reflected on its air, to become a national version of local TV news, with "it bleeds, it leads" sensibilities and a complete emphasis on simple stories told in front of courthouses rather than anything researched, the word needs to go out.
They have surrendered to the blogosphere.
With local TV news no longer covering politics or policy, and with cable news now virtually ignoring it, what other conclusion can be drawn?
It's not as if politics has no audience. Political blogs have the highest audiences, and highest degree of audience participation, in the blogosphere. Many are profitable, some wildly so. Many also break real news stories, either through the efforts of the people running them or just from common posters who do their own investigations and report the results.
In the history of journalism this is big news.
But it's not being reported as such.
I wonder why?
If Ted Turner were dead he'd be rolling in his grave. I guess he's just rolling in the grass with the buffalo. Did he have to sign a no-speak clause in order to get out of that AOL-Time Warner deal by the way? Because he's been awful quiet.
Or perhaps no one is covering him.
If you're out there, Ted, give me a call.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business Strategy | Internet | Journalism | Politics | blogging
- RELATED ENTRIES
- The Legend of Dennis Hayes
- Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
- Welcome to 1966
- What Must Craigslist Do?
- No Such Thing as Free WiFi
- The Internet As A Political Issue
- Google Images Ruled Illegal
- Fall of Radio Shack
1. Russell Shaw on May 11, 2005 11:51 AM writes...
Consultants and focus groups, I'd suspect. Any time I see media being dumbed down, those are bound to be two key reasons.
Might be different if we were in midst of a major campaign, but for right now,runaway brides, Michael Jackson trial,etc.
And as far as tech world is concerned,the coverage I see is either "here's a cool new device that..." or, on the other side,overwrought and alarmist, like saying asking rhetorical questions about dangers of stuff.
Leaves little room for measured,nuanced analysis, except maybe on shows like Charlie Rose. There may be an assumption that measured analysis and futurism just ain't as visually compelling as showing that cool new media player or the weeping woman who has been plunged into crisis by online identity theft.
Permalink to Comment