Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Boston area?: Join us on June 11 for Startups and the Cloud, a free event on cloud computing with insights from Intuit founder Scott Cook and others

Moore's Lore

« Google-ology | Main | AMD's Big Chance »

August 26, 2005

A Modest Proposal

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

burqa.jpgHere's something I haven't seen proposed anywhere. But since I'm "just a blogger" and I can't get the thought of my head, why not?

Read on. If you dare.

Many in the U.S., on both the left and right, say our enemy is Islamic Fundamentalism. One of the hallmarks of that movement (besides violent anti-Israel rhetoric) is the systematic subjugation of women.

Wherever Sha'ria (Islamic Law) is imposed, women lose their humanity. They are killed if they're raped, killed if they so much as meet with a man unchaparoned. They are ritually abused in a horror called "female circumcision" which removes their clitoris, often without anethesia.

Under Sha'ria women are treated worse than dogs. A dog who licks a stranger's hand may get a treat. An Arab woman who even looks the wrong way at a stranger will be killed by her family. (Any devout Muslim woman who wants to argue with me that slavery is freedom, please don't waste your time.)

When the Bush Administration wanted to find support for its Iraq adventure early this year the President claimed this was a war for womens' rights. He even used an Iraqi woman as a prop at his State of the Union address. (She now wants out.)

Well, it seems to me we have the wrong Muslim refugees in the West. So here's my modest proposal:

  • Define Sha'ria Islam as a crime against women. Any cleric, any individual, who tries to impose it in the West, or advocates for it, can go somewhere it's practiced. Out, the lot of you.
  • Any woman with a reasonable fear of persecution (any secular woman willing to admit it) can come on in.

amanpour.christiane.jpgEven I can see the holes in this. Islamicists around the world will see this as a war against men, as the Great Satan looking to steal their women.

But that's the problem, isn't it? Women are not property. They do not belong to men. They do not belong to a religion, or their families, or their nations. They are all their own individuals, every one of them, and have a basic human right to make their own choices, about who they will see, about what they will learn, about what they will wear, and about their bodies.

That's something I'm perfectly willing to fight for, even to die for, the liberation of half of humanity from the violence of the other half.

But I don't expect this Administration to make the present conflict a war for choice.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Politics | war


TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/7512


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack