About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Moore's Lore

« Mobile "Internet" Service Isn't | Main | Fight for the New Interface »

August 29, 2005

The Killer App for Broadband

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

p2ptraffic.pngOm Malik has a wise commentary today on how peer-to-peer services (p2p) is the killer app for broadband.

He offers a Cachelogic chart showing how p2p services (but more specifically eDonkey) are driving total Internet traffic. In fact, more than half the total Internet traffic monitored by Cachelogic, according to the chart, is eDonkey traffic. (The illustration was copied from Malik's blog, but credit should go to Cachelogic.)

Then Malik makes some really key points (boldfacing is mine):

  • In the long term, however P2P traffic if not managed properly is going to become a big problem.
  • The explosion in P2P traffic is going to have an impact on the people who don’t use the P2P services as well.
  • Due to P2P’s symmetrical nature on average 80% of upstream capacity is consumed by P2P.

What's troubling to Malik is how distribution costs are being shifted wholesale to "pipe owners," the Internet backbone owners. With major studios and other content producers looking at p2p as a distribution method, this trend will only accelerate.

So let me add a question.

At what point does all this force the construction of new Internet backbone capacity? At what point do we overwhelm Moore's Law of Fiber, in other words, and require new builds? And, if those builds are based on Moore's Law of Fiber, how do we make sure those new builds aren't built with an eye toward monopoly?

Let's assume for a moment (for the sake of argument) that a fiber line installed today will have 1,000 times the capacity of one installed five years ago. This makes it difficult, economically, have more than a few suppliers, once the capacity of the present system is reached.

The best solution would seem to be for the backbone to move to a utility model, where build-out investment can be controlled and prices can be as well. But given the recent history of regulated utilities, this sounds like a disaster.

Once current backbone capacities are stretched, in other words, the fight for control of the Internet begins in earnest.

One more point. Isn't it possible that backbone pipe owners are encouraging this growth of p2p to hasten that day, and increase their control of the market?

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business Models | Economics | Futurism | Internet | Telecommunications


1. BH on August 29, 2005 05:39 PM writes...

At what point does all this force the construction of new Internet backbone capacity?

The previous decade saw a glutton of dark fiber produced. We can't leverage any of that?

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:


Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):

The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack