About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Moore's Lore

« Rice Wins Again! | Main | The Internet as Shopping Mall »

September 19, 2005

Gittin' While the Gittin's Good

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

joebarton.jpgThe winds of change are blowing hurricane-force in Washington. Every politician in town knows it. So the natural inclination is to push the envelope as far as possible, knowing that it will be pulled back fairly quickly.

This is as true regarding the Internet as anywhere else. The Bell-cable duopoly hangs by a thread. Wireless ISPs have Moore's Law on their side. The incumbents need something very strong to counter.

This is precisely what they're going for with a bill in the House that would raise entry barriers to the sky and prevent independent ISPs from ever gaining a market toehold. (That's the chairman of the committee proposing the legislation, Joe Barton, up above.)

Naturally they call it "pro-competitive," but in the Orwellian Washington of today those with a Clue should never listen to what they say but look at what they do.

The bill is also filled with goodies for broadcasters and TV networks, such as:

  1. Imposition of broadcast content regulation on the Internet.
  2. Forced licensing of all broadband ISPs.
  3. VOIP fully regulated, with providers taxed for the Bell's "Universal Service Fund."

Internet broadband is to be treated as broadcast in order to censor it, and to be treated as telephony in order to keep out competition.

The excuse is this is a re-write of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which mandated competition for the incumbents and displayed a complete "hands-off" attitude toward what went over the pipes.

Am I worried? Not really.

Here's what ranking member John Dingell said about the bill. "This staff draft is a very useful starting point in the process." And that's all it is. John McCain chairs the equivalent Senate committee. This bill has barely started on the path toward law.

And I guarantee it will be overtaken by events. Just put it up as a marker against anyone who supports it. They want to control what you'll read, what you'll see, how you'll use the Internet and who you'll buy it from, forevermore. They're out in the open about it. Despite the Orwellian rhetoric, they're Soviets.

And that's good to know.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business Strategy | Internet | Politics | Telecommunications | law

TrackBack URL:


Remember Me?


Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):

The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack