Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Moore's Lore

« Race to the Bottom | Main | Music Industry Profits Down »

October 03, 2005

This Week's Clue: George Lindsay

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

This week's issue of my free weekly newsletter, A-Clue.Com, was closer to the subject of this blog, talking about international economics. (Subscribe here.)

Enjoy.


john lindsay.jpgIt's a special responsibility to have a reserve currency. (The picture is of the late John V. Lindsay (1921-2000), Mayor of New York from 1966-1974.)

The honor is not lightly given. History requires liquidity, military power and a reputation for sobriety before it grants the honor. The honor, once lost, can never be reclaimed.

Until the 19th century gold was the world's reserve currency. The British pound became a reserve currency only because it was believed to be tied to gold. Precious metals make good reserves because their supply is fairly fixed. They're difficult to mine and extract. Gold's ability to serve as a reserve currency in this century is being undermined, in part, by new chemical mining techniques which dramatically increase yields.

The American Indians' reserve currency of choice until the 17th century, wampum made from mother-of-pearl, was undermined by the western invention of a machine that let colonists mass produce the stuff.

The lesson is simple. A reserve currency must be supply-constrained. If it can be inflated, if it is over-inflated, it pops and ceases to have value.

The U.S. dollar has been the international reserve currency since 1945. Spending produced liquiity, our armed forces brought us victory, and our central bankers knew to take the punch bowl away when the party got going.

Democrats lost the faith of the world's other central bankers during Vietnam. By spending on both guns and butter we ran what looked like large deficits. The first Nixon budget showed a surplus. Democrats have never recovered that faith. Even the reign of Clinton was accompanied by the conservative Republican Alan Greenspan running our central bank, the Federal Reserve. By the 1990s there was no real alternative to the dollar as a reserve currency.


The result was a form of immunity, felt by the new Administration, concerning history, economics, and what is usually called fiduciary responsibility.

The assumption of immunity from economic rules was also popular in the 1960s, in New York City, which was just ending an unprecedented, debt-fueled spending spree under the leadership of Robert Moses. Most of Moses' debts were secured by tolls to use bridges and tunnels. Moses had also built huge apartment complexes for the poor, supposedly secured by rent, but that rent would no longer be paid by those fated to live in them.

Under Mayor John Lindsay, New York accelerated its borrowings. But while Moses at least borrowed to build, Lindsay borrowed to live. He borrowed so he wouldn't have to face hard choices about the failure of public housing, about the salaries of city workers, about the city's bloated bureaucracy and its various neighborhood feifdoms.

Lindsay escaped office without paying these bills but his successor, a small Jewish accountant named Abe Beame, who had long warned of the policy's stupidity, was left holding the bag. When he sought one more bailout from the federal government, President Gerald Ford refused (at first) leading to the famous headline "Ford to City: Drop Dead."

The fondest hope of George Bush is to escape office before his bills come due, to leave them to his own Abe Beame.

He won't.

For one thing, the people holding these bills aren't as nice as Gerald Ford. They're Chinese.

We've been given grace on our bills because China has its own problems. Its system is like a pressure cooker, with the fire turned high. The only way to release steam is through spending, both public and private. The IOUs we've been sending from our Wal-Mart shoppers are already being spent, on Space, on the Olympics, and on paying-off millions of officials, major and minor, in order to keep their own social ponzi scheme going.

The reckoning for both systems is coming quickly, but more quickly for us than for them. Most analysts fear that diplomacy may fail. I'm more worried that we're now borrowing more than China can absorb.

What happens when a system over-borrows is called inflation. Too many new dollars chase the world's goods, and people look for alternatives to keep their own money safe. The Euro is one alternative and Euros are now worth nearly $1.30. The British pound is another and it's now worth nearly $2. Gold is a third and it is now worth over $450 the ounce.

In the Chinese Century I posited the idea that the Chinese Yuan could become another reserve currency. China has only now taken the first steps toward this role, allowing the currency to trade in slightly wider bands. As it finds the Yuan trading to the high side of this band (fewer yuan for the dollar) the band will be expanded, gradually. Once the bands are gone, traders will be truly free to choose holdings in yuan or dollars.

The market, in other words, will then get the chance to decide the fate of George W. Bush. His fate, and ours, will be in the hands of experienced currency speculators, men like George Soros, who either do not wish us well or who don't care one way or the other about us. (You choose.)

When they choose yuan, China has us by the short hairs. They have the immunity to disaster the Bushistas now claim for themselves. With our heads in the noose, China will then control us, utterly. It won't matter whom we elect, not at all.

The holders of the new reserve currency will be able to demand we reduce our military spending, and retreat from their "sphere of influence." They can start pricing oil in their currency, not ours. Their middle class can grow in wealth, while ours decreases, in both wealth and number. Our freedom of action disappears, across the board.

A possible 2007 headline. Beijing to U.S.: Drop dead.
pyle_goober1.jpg
The title of this piece combined the names of John Lindsay and George W. Bush. The result, George Lindsay, is the name of the actor who played Goober on The Andy Griffith Show (and its successors). He was the town rube, the auto mechanic who would roll his eyes and shout "Golll-eeee" whenever the show needed a cheap laugh.

It fits, but if you're an American, or your kids are, then they and you will be Goober, from the moment China chooses to make you Goober. (Or if the markets beat them to it, as they are doing right now.)

I can assure you the result won't be funny.

Comments (9) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: B2B | Economics | Investment | Politics | Security


COMMENTS

1. jim on October 3, 2005 02:51 PM writes...

This is actually hard to follow there are too many inaccuracies. For a reserver currency ..."History requires liquidity, military power and a reputation for sobriety before it grants the honor." As you say gold was the world's reserve currency until the 1900s, but it had exteremely little liquidity, and since it was not a national currency, had no military power or reputation, so clearly that was not a requirement for a reserve currency.

"A reserve currency must be supply-constrained. If it can be inflated, if it is over-inflated, it pops and ceases to have value." That depends upon how you define over-inflated...During the 1970's the US dollar faced a greater challenge than in does today, and it did not cease to have value. The issue is quite simple, the holders of the currency must have faith that the currency will remain valuable. Supply-constrained is a good thing, but in no way a requirement.

"What happens when a system over-borrows is called inflation.".....No, if this were the case then we would have double digit inflation right now.

Please more comments on technology, and less on your doomsday political and economic commentary.

Permalink to Comment

2. Lindon on October 3, 2005 11:29 PM writes...

Yeah much of the economic rationalisation seems suspect, but still China holds your IOU (there's no escaping that), and it *will* cost you.

And yes "It won't matter whom we elect, not at all". Well this is the same as every other western nation whilst you were top dog. Dont expect anyone out there to come save you either("special relationship" or not). You've been a terrible custodian of the western world for the past 60 years, and especially so in the last 5. Worse even than the British, which is really saying something.

Permalink to Comment

3. Monty on October 4, 2005 11:12 AM writes...

Linden sounds a little bitter...

Tell you what I'll place my bet with the US..as I think most will at the end of the day.
(Better the devil you know...)

Permalink to Comment

4. Rustle on October 4, 2005 02:59 PM writes...

With the exception of your current price quotes, euro = $1.19, you are on the money. Pun intended. The reason we don't have double digit inflation is due to the dishonest nature of the cpi calculation. Plus the real inflation is currently in asset bubbles. Housing is increasing double digit.

Permalink to Comment

5. BudNapier on October 4, 2005 07:33 PM writes...

Disapointing Title:

This being primarily a technical area fot your post, I thought that you were referring to the great technical analyst George Lindsey.

George was known for his great analytic work forecasting tops which he called "3 peaks and a domed house" among others.

Permalink to Comment

6. BudNapier on October 4, 2005 07:34 PM writes...

Disapointing Title:

This being primarily a technical area fot your post, I thought that you were referring to the great technical analyst George Lindsey.

George was known for his great analytic work forecasting tops which he called "3 peaks and a domed house" among others.

Permalink to Comment

7. WDZeller on October 4, 2005 11:00 PM writes...

The currency of the United States has been a
fiat currency since August of 1971. Like all fiat currencies of the past, it too will soon be doomed to extinction. Remember, Voltaire once said," All fiat currencies eventually return to their intrensic value- zero".

The first fiat monetary system was implemented by the Mongol Empire around the year 1250 A.D., and since that time period, no fiat currency has lasted more than 41 years. To date, our system is now 34 years old.

To give you an idea where our own debt-based monetary scheme is today, consider housing debt, one of the primary engines of credit growth. It took 208 years to reach $5 Trillion. Between 1997 and 2005, it doubled to $10 trillion. At current rates of expansion, it will be around $20 Trillion about 2012, and $40 Trillion by 2020. Only a fool can believe this will continue.

Derivative-based debt, the other new method of creating fiat money, just hit $1 Quadrillon (that's a million billion dollars, folks!). It is currently compounding at a yearly rate of about 40%. Please keep in mind that there's only around $850 Billion of cash money in circulation. That means for every dollar of "cash" (government debt, which is supposedly better than other debt), there is around $1175 of lower grade debt.

By now everyone should get my point. America will either experience the one of the greatest deflations in the history of the world, or the greatest hyperinflations ever imagined.

Oh, here is one more tidbit of statistics. Over the last 100 years, everytime the Dow Theory has signaled a long term, primary bear market, the Dow to Gold ratio has bottomed out at a 1 to 1 ratio EVERY Time. The Dow is currently around 10,500 and gold is at around $470. If the Dow doesn't change, then sooner or later gold should be priced at about $10,500 per ounce. Or perhaps, the Dow will drop to under 500 points. Maybe, they'll meet in the middle. Either way, our world is soon to be turned upside down.

America, welcome to the realities of the culture of Imperial Decline!

Permalink to Comment

8. Joeb on October 4, 2005 11:13 PM writes...

It's sad to say, but American's think they are immune to the laws of economics.

Permalink to Comment

9. efficiency on October 5, 2005 11:51 PM writes...

What's the difference between a counterfeiter in his basement and a government whose printing press runs 24/7?

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/13764

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack