Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Moore's Lore

« Porn Fight Kills the E-Mail Guy | Main | The Law and Google »

January 29, 2006

This Week's Clue The Entrepreneurial Team

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

This week's issue of A-Clue.Com is on-topic (for once).

It's about e-commerce, and about how to make start-ups work.

Specifically we're talking about what it takes to get a start-up launched and the character of a successful entrepreneur, who is at its heart.

You're invited to join the A-Clue.Com community by clicking this link. Always free.


entrepreneurial%20team.gif
I learned a great and terrible lesson recently.

While it's true that anyone can launch a business, an entrepreneurial business must be a team from the start.

Sure, you need the entrepreneur, the idea person. You need someone who can find the money, who can sell the scheme, who can adjust to events, who can lead. You need someone of boundless energy, determination, ambition, and (especially) ruthlessness.

If your business is going to be on the Internet, you need a content guy. Having an Internet business without a content guy is like having a restaurant without a chef. On my latest venture, I'm the content guy (not the entrepreneur).

The content guy is committed to the editorial mission of the site (and even stores have an editorial mission). The content guy has contacts, a voice, an understanding of what's needed to attract attention and credibility. A content guy might be able to run the whole show himself, if this were a small business. But it's not, so keep the content guy in his place.

There's a third team member needed, and many businesses fail to plan for this. That's the tech person. In a restaurant this would be the maitre 'd. In an old-line manufacturing business this would be the engineer. In retailing it's a number cruncher. A geek, in other words. Gotta have a geek.

While today's Web tools are much more powerful and simple to use than ever before, they're still tools. Every step toward simplicity is matched by a step toward power. While users may use your Web site to simplify their lives, or even their own creation of content, that's not how it works inside the site business.

Think of your word processor. You, as an ordinary user, are not going to use all the functions of your word processor. You will find ways to make the program do what you want, and ignore the rest. I was amazed, years ago, when I found my 8 year old using complex key combinations on Word I'd never dreamt of using, and performing some functions I had never considered performing. Most people use just 5% of their word processor's functionality, and this is true for their other tools as well.

But if you were to build a business around that word processor, you'd need a tech guy (or gal) who knew how to use 100% of that functionality, or nearly that much. They would need to understand all your customers' use of the tool, the mistakes they would make and how to correct them. They would even have to fix problems in the program.

For an entrepreneurial start-up to work all the members of this team must be committed to the venture. They must be like the bacon on the breakfast plate. The chicken who gave the eggs is involved in the venture. The pig is committed. Give me no chickens.

It may be possible to find all these skills in one person, if that person is extremely bright and very young. But I have learned (to my horror) that the 18-hour days and 90-hour weeks of the young just can't be handled by those of us with gray in our hair. Wisdom comes at the cost of energy, and the need to pace yourself. That's the trade-off. It's the way of the world.

The course of life always leads in a direction. An entrepreneurial business will use all of that direction in its asset base. And if that life has been lived at all, you'll soon find holes in the roads not taken, no matter how much of a polymath you may be.

So build a team.

ENTREPRENEUR.JPG

Even with a powerful team, you're going to find yourself in deep water, inside any entrepreneurial business. You're going to find yourself doing things you're not accustomed to, learning skills you don't want to learn. It's a tough slog. With luck, you're going to start hiring soon, and slough some of these duties on to others, people who will do them better. When you've hired everyone who does things better than you, then and only then are you ready for leadership.

Having studied entrepreneurs for 30 years, close-up, I can say that they are really different from most of us. They generally have enormous energy, big egos, something of a messianic complex, along with a willingness to let go, not just of parts of their jobs but of the whole business. The best entrepreneurs are in it for the chase, not the money. They care about the thrill of the building, for the buying and selling, for the hunt rather than the kill. It's a discipline much like any other, but only 1% of those who take it up, no matter how much they may learn about it at school, will be any good at it. It's like playing the guitar or writing or cooking in that way. You have a lot of journeymen, and a very few stars. The stars launch, grow, sell, and launch again. Those who stay do so by constantly expanding their visions, or by starting with such a big vision that they must grow a big company to know they've succeeded.

The credit and wealth we give entrepreneurs, and their teams, is well-earned. But the fact is there are very few true entrepreneurs out there, and very few truly entrepreneurial businesses. As a business culture, America has a lot of scrubs making star money, partly because we don't accept the rarity of true entrepreneurship, or understand that for a real entrepreneur, money is just one measuring stick.

I see a lot of small businessmen calling themselves entrepreneurs, and the differences are easy to spot. Ask someone who calls themselves an entrepreneur, "how much to walk away" and most true entrepreneurs will come up with a figure. True entrepreneurs aren't wedded to the business, but the process, the chase, the game.

Most of the people we call great entrepreneurs are, in fact, one trick ponies. Bill Gates is a one trick pony. Sam Walton was a one-trick pony. They had one idea and rode that horse to victory. But that's not entrepreneurship.

Steve Jobs is an entrepreneur. Every new product he launches is a separate entrepreneurial enterprise. It's a rare talent, something you can hear in Gershwin, or read in Rushdie. It's not something you learn in school.

I wish I were a Rushdie, or a Mozart, or even a Jobs, but I have learned that I'm a Salieri, fit to study the great but without the spark that makes for true greatness. I will commit to joining a team, I will work my butt off for the cause, but no matter how much I study entrepreneurship, I'll never gain the knack.

But it sure is fun to try.

Comments (2) + TrackBacks (1) | Category: Business Models | Business Strategy | Consulting | Investment | e-commerce | marketing | online advertising


COMMENTS

1. Brad Hutchings on January 29, 2006 03:53 PM writes...

I blogged about this (see crackbacks), but one small thing I would take issue with is the chicken/pig metaphor. If the chicken positions her eggs effectively, she is far more valuable than the pig. A chicken who could have commanded a higher price for her eggs from someone else is sending an important message about what she sees as the upside of the venture. The pig, on the other hand, is selling himself out -- and short.

Chickens are likely to be deliberate and thoughtful, assessing upside and downside at each step, and not letting things get out of hand. If you can persuade a chicken, then your plan has been validated and endorsed. Pigs are likely to succeed spectacularly or fail miserably. The problem is that success or failure of the pig isn't usually a reflection of the pig, but of the circumstances he finds himself in.

Most importantly though, the best chickens know how to ratchet up the value of their eggs. In business, the goal is to make more money than you spend, and one part of the equation is ratcheting up the value of assets and products. The chicken knows that you can't give it away for free and make it up on volume. But the chicken also knows how to turn an underperforming asset into a calling card or use it to generate goodwill for the business.

Permalink to Comment

2. kawaii on January 30, 2006 09:21 AM writes...

We still love you dana

*hugs*

Permalink to Comment

TRACKBACKS

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/27283

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference This Week's Clue The Entrepreneurial Team:

What's an entrepreneur? from Two Big Dogs, One Giant Sucker
Dana Blankenhorn writes about his recent startup experience and concludes that he's probably not an entrepreneur. Great post Dana. One thing I have learned is that startups can succeed for quite awhile despite screwing everything up, even badly. It's... [Read More]

Tracked on January 29, 2006 03:35 PM

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack