Corante

About this Author
Dana Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for over 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the "Interactive Age Daily" for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, and dozens of other publications over the years.
About this Site
Moore’s Law defines the history of technology. It held that the number of circuits etched on a given piece of silicon could double every 18 months as far as its author, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, could see. Moore’s Law has spawned constant revolutions since then, not just in computing but in communications, in science, in a host of areas. Moore’s Law applies to radios, and to optical fiber, but there are some areas where it doesn’t apply. In this blog we’ll take a daily look at new implications of Moore’s Law in real time, as it rolls forward to create our future.
Media Bloggers
Don't Miss The DrugSafetyHub, a new blog on counterfeit drugs and the evolution of the pharma industry

Moore's Lore

« The Superbowl's Most Important Ad | Main | The Return of Political Spam »

February 09, 2006

The TV Barrier

Email This Entry

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn

bruceATpiano.GIFOn another list I’ve been discussing the nefarious Bell plan to kill the Internet by hoarding digital bandwidth.

Bruce Kushnick’s e-book, “The $200 Billion Broadband Scandal,” is fascinating in this regard.

But what if the Bells aren’t solely to blame?

The thought occurred to me when Kushnick began talking about “The TV Barrier.” The TV Barrier is the speed at which the real-time exchange of HDTV video becomes possible over the Internet.

Right now we could breach this barrier. Other countries – Korea, China, Japan – already have. We don’t really need fiber. We can do it with copper, we can do it with wireless. Stop wasting copper bandwidth on voice and your DSL line could deliver it. Give us enough unlicensed frequencies and your WiFi set-up could deliver it. Stop hoarding local bandwidth for cable competition that will never happen and it would be easy.

But here’s the problem. If bits are just bits (and they are just bits) then how do we get continuing revenue for our movies and TV shows? Cable does this by dividing bandwidth into “channels” and charging both sides of the transaction for everything that goes through, whether you watch it or not. Everyone gets paid. The channels get their monthly fees even if you leave the TV off.

This doesn’t happen when bits are bits.

Even the iPod “compromise” doesn’t answer this business model problem. OK, we’ll pay for songs we value. But what about songs we don’t value? What about TV shows we don’t value? Where is the payment for that?

Fact is, it costs just as much to make a bad TV show or a bad movie as it does a good one. Hollywood is limited in its ability to produce by what it can expect to get out of its many flops, plus the profits it can get from its few hits.

It costs more money to produce good video than it does good text, and the percentage of hits is just as low. It’s this continuing revenue stream for failure that “Tellywood” wants to protect, and in this their interests are aligned perfectly with the Bells which are hoarding broadband bits, and the cable operators who are doing the same.

The only way these industries will allow the Internet to burst through the TV Barrier is by solving this business model problem. And they’re perfectly willing to take the U.S. economy down with them while they wait.

susan%20estrada.jpgOn the $200BillionScandal blog I’ve been editing for Bruce Kushnick and others, Firstmile.Us CEO Susan Estrada today ticked off a list of the industries we’re losing because of this business model impasse. Healthcare. Education. The Internet itself.

We need solutions, and we need them now.

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Internet


COMMENTS

1. Jesse Kopelman on February 9, 2006 05:05 PM writes...

I don't see this as being as immediate a problem as you make it out. Even with all the bandwidth "wasted" on broadcasting video, there is still a lot more than the network owners are prepared to give out. Cablevision had no problem ramping up to 50 Mbps over the same lines that are clogged with hundreds of TV channels. Certain companies, Verizon being at the top of the list, just like to hoard bandwidth. They've spent billions on spectrum they don't even use (meanwhile people are obsessing over the cost of FIOS?). Sprint, Cingular, and Comcast all have enough unused wireless spectrum to offer WiMax to 10s of millions of people without taking any resources away from their existing networks. So, yes bandwidth hoarding is a serious issue, but it's been going on for a very long time and it will take a lot more than TV reform to make it go away.

Permalink to Comment

2. Amos on February 14, 2006 10:07 AM writes...

The big boys are asking to be rewarded for failure, again.

The hypocricy of the head of SBC: talking about market economics and Google getting a "free ride on his pipes" and then depending on gaming the regulatory system to make a profit.

Per the comment above - WE PAID FOR THE DAMNED BANDWIDTH ALREADY. Of course it's a problem when the you pay for something, and then the system allows the vendors to decide how, when, and if they're going to deliver, or whether they're going to require you to pay the bill again.

Permalink to Comment

3. Ed on February 21, 2006 04:56 PM writes...

I've read parts of "The $200 billion broadband scandal" and I recently read the blog as well. After reading them, I was interested in learning more about Astroturfing, the Bells and their fake consumer groups, and after playing around on the Internet, I found this website that I thought you'd be interested in:

http://www.phoneybaloney.net

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/backtar.cgi/28409

POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
The Legend of Dennis Hayes
Evolution Changes Its Mind (Again)
Welcome to 1966
What Must Craigslist Do?
No Such Thing as Free WiFi
The Internet As A Political Issue
Google Images Ruled Illegal
Fall of Radio Shack